I Can’t Finish Reading Brick Lane

I am at page 156 of Monica Ali’s Brick Lane and I simply can’t go on. I can’t read one more page about the miserable apartment-ridden life of Nazneen and her arranged marriage to the buffoon Chanu or their unhappy kids or the terrible life of Nazneen’s sister Hasina or the boring gossip by and about Mrs. Islam and Razia.

I’m disappointed. I’ve wanted to read this book for some time. So I finally bought a copy and cracked it open. I feel like I’m supposed to really like this book. But reading it is drudgery. It’s very well-written. Ali writes with grace and an attention to detail and characterization that is admirable and clearly places her among the talented. But there is absolutely no inertia in the story. I don’t feel the characters have any particular drive and there seems to be little at stake.

But don’t take my word. Here are some of the glowing blurbs for this book:

“Like Zadie Smith’s White Teeth, Ali’s debut novel is set in multicultural London; but unlike Smith’s antic, sprawling vision, Ali’s is cool, confined, and unsparing. Meticulously following the circumscribed life of Nazneen, a sheltered, devoutly Muslim, married Bangladeshi garment worker, the novel depicts her experience through her own constricted and, to the reader, alien point of view. (Ali practices the self-effacement of the supremely confident writer as she subordinates her style to her protagonist’s perspective.)” Benjamin Schwarz, The Atlantic Monthly

“The joy of this book is its marriage of wonderful writer with a fresh, rich and hidden world…written with love and compassion for every struggling character in its pages.” Evening Standard

“Already one of the most significant British novelists of her generation.” The Observer (London)

“Brick Lane is a brilliant book about things that matter.” Ian Jack, Granta

I tried to find a negative review of Brick Lane but couldn’t fine one. Maybe because the Brits are new at incorporating immigrants they find this all so fascinating. Or the fact that London is multicultural is somehow news, too. I don’t now. What they’re thinking at the Atlantic, I can only guess. This is the magazine that’s pretty much relegated publishing short fiction to one issue a year instead of regularly, demonstrating loud and clear its interest in keeping literature alive.

For me Brick Lane is an inferior version Flaubert’s “Madame Bovary” or Chopin’s “The Awakening”, or any other 19th century novel about confined women, with some New Immigrant Experience thrown in. As the descendant of immigrants and having lived next door to immigrants, Ali’s tale seemed well-worn and unremarkable. For a work to be praised so much, I had expected something truly ground-breaking in terms of literature, like Arundhati Roy’s “The God of Small Things” or Rushdie’s “Midnight’s Children.” Maybe I had the wrong expectations.

I took a short break from the book to reread Tracks by Louise Erdrich. In that book, truly a great one, you get deep lively characters struggling under the grind of history, all rendered in a distinctive voice that depicts their world in vivid detail and fullness. (If you haven’t read Tracks, go out and get yourself a copy. I will warn you though that reading the Pauline sections of the book can at times be like reading a more lucid version of Quentin from Faulkner’s “The Sound and the Fury.”) I then tried returning to Brick Lane only to feel the unrewarding drudgery again. So I stopped. Life is too short and my TBR pile is too high.

There I am: a reader who has failed at reading Brick Lane.

Next up, I finally tackle Leon Forrest’s Divine Days.

Wasted Ink

Today there is a lot of wasted ink on the part of the Lansing State Journal in the service of Senator Bishop’s column.

Sorry, Senator. But talking about “government reforms and spending cuts” without actually describing those reforms or identifying the departments and programs targeted for spending cuts doesn’t count as a plan.

"Leadership with a vision"

In case you haven’t seen it before, here’s the banner atop the Senate Republican’s page.


It’s pretty snazzy-looking and functionally designed, with some pretty pictures of the Capitol building and even the Mackinac Bridge, all on a nice shade of green. (Though rarely is the Republican party considered green.) It also says that their motto is “Leadership with a vision.”

According to this definition, leadership means:
–noun
1. the position or function of a leader: He managed to maintain his leadership of the party despite heavy opposition.

2. ability to lead: She displayed leadership potential.

3. an act or instance of leading; guidance; direction: They prospered under his leadership.

Senator Bishop is the Senate Majority Leader, elected by his caucus to lead them. But as far as ability…well, that’s where he and the GOP run into some trouble. No one seems to know where Senator Bishop is guiding the GOP or in which direction. He says “no” a lot, just like his party yesterday did in telling Governor Granholm “no” to her plan to close a prison in Jackson. I guess if he led them all in a chant of “no, no, no,” in the Capitol Rotunda that might qualify as some form of leadership. Maybe of the Chorusmaster type. But only if he could get them all to throw in some good and interesting harmonization or even a short solo piece by Senator Cropsey with some fiery coloratura.

Now, let’s look at the definition of the word vision:
–noun
1. the act or power of sensing with the eyes; sight.
2. the act or power of anticipating that which will or may come to be: prophetic vision; the vision of an entrepreneur.

This word doesn’t seem to apply to the Senate GOP either. First, no foresight has been displayed on Senator Bishop’s part in regards to the budget deficit or in the Governor actually presenting a plan. Nor does he appear to have anticipated being asked to come up with a list of cuts so that he can keep his Tax-Hating Pledge to His Non-Benevolence Grover Norquist. Plus, no one has yet been able to sense the Republican budget proposal with their eyes.

As improbable as it is, it could just be that the dictionary definitions of leadership and vision are somehow incorrect. Or maybe Senator Bishop and his GOP colleagues don’t understand what those words really mean.

Bishop’s Pledge

The Budget Impasse continues here in Michigan. It’s been two weeks since Governor Granholm presented her solutions to fix the deficit (a mix of program cuts, tax cuts and, by far the most controversial, a 2% tax added to services) which were then were soundly rejected by the Senate Republicans, led by Mike Bishop.

This wasn’t much of a surprise. Senator Bishop is a big follower of the Tax-Cutting Guru Grover Norquist, who believes using taxes to help those in need is a form of theft. Seriously. If you don’t believe me, here’s an exchange between Alain de Botton and His Non-Benevolence:

“Why shouldn’t the state help the needy?” asked de Botton.
“Because to do that,” said Norquist, “you would have to steal money from people who earned it and give it to people who didn’t. And then you make the state into a thief.”
“You’re suggesting that taxation is theft?
“Taxation beyond the legitimate requirements of providing for justice is theft, sure.”

Bishop even signed Norquist’s famous Taxpayer Protection Pledge (TPP). It reads as follows:

I, ____________, pledge to the taxpayers of the _____ district of the State of _________ and to all the people of this state, that I will oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.

It’s pretty simple and straight-forwarded. President Bush has signed it. So have lots of other Michigan Republicans, including Congressmen Mr. Grin Mike Rogers, the Club for Growth’s Tim Walberg, and Non-Smoking Seminar Advocate Joe Knollenberg. You can see how it’s done wonders for cutting the Federal Deficit. The pledge is not yet as famous as the Communist Denial: I am not, nor have I ever been, a member of the Communist Party. But it does have a devoted following.

I must confess, that just like Norquist and his followers, I hate paying taxes. I also hate paying revenue enhancements, fees, service charges, and even for parking, too. Who doesn’t? Like the New York Yankees, taxes are an easy thing to hate. But they pay for many things I like and many things I don’t. That’s the bargain I’ve made with my fellow citizens.

Unfortunately for Senator Bishop and TPP signatories, balancing budgets that pay for services many people want is not simple. Hence all the silence and secrecy surrounding the details of the Senate Majority Leader’s plan to plug the fiscal hole in the budget. Not to mention the diversionary tactics of setting up a subcommittee to investigate the state’s prisons and the Corrections department (announced after the Governor said she would close a prison in Jackson to save money) and holding hearings to find out what the Michigan Economic Development Corporation is doing (apparently, Senate Republicans had no idea that the state of Michigan has a public/private partnership that has been successful in luring businesses here).

Yet another day went by and yet another story quoting Republicans appeared in a local paper in which they claimed they can fix the shortfall with cuts alone (but none to education) and no tax increases. But not even so much as an outline for a non-tax-increase plan was revealed.

Then yesterday Senator Bishop sent an open letter to the Governor asking to meet with her to resolve the budget crisis.

While there were clearly areas of common ground in your initial Executive Order, we have stated publicly on several occasions, that raising taxes without an exhaustive review of all other options is not a path we are interested in pursuing.

Again with the no tax increase. You see, if Senator Bishop votes for any kind of tax increase (no matter how small), he will be put in Norquist’s Hall of Shame.

Which might not be such a bad thing. Norquist and his people believe that government is inherently evil, and that it should never try to do anything more than keep a standing army and lock up people who break laws. The fact that a government program like Social Security has worked and continues to work drives them crazy because it points to a big gaping hole in their narrow ideology. (Note: it is scientifically impossible for any person who supported or voted for Amway Guy last year to make the criticism that Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme.)

It might help Senator Bishop if he remembers what he said when he took the oath of office. Here’s what the Michigan Constitution requires you to pledge, from Article 18:

Sec. 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such officers as may by law be exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective office, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (of affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of this state, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ________ according to the best of my ability.” And no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust.

That’s pretty simple, too. Plus, last time I checked, taxes and tax increases were constitutional. Seeing as how it’s the taxpayers of Michigan who pay Senator Bishop’s salary, it would be reasonable to expect him to uphold his pledge to us before following the intellectually and morally bankrupt path being slashed by Norquist and his followers.

So the question is: Where do you stand, Senator?

Mario Vargas Llosa at the Wharton Center

I have just come back from a lecture by Mario Vargas Llosa at the Wharton Center on the MSU campus. He spoke about the similarities and essential differences between literature and history. It was very stimulating.

He said (and I’m paraphrasing much less eloquently) fiction is about lying and using those lies to show the hopes and passions of people at points in history. What history can’t do. History having a moral obligation to sticking to the facts. But the writer, working from his or her own memory and personal conflicts, in using these lies to create fiction, affirms the sovereignty of the individual.

Here’s an excerpt from another essay:

Removing blindfolds, expressing indignation in the face of injustice and demonstrating that there is room for hope under the most trying circumstances, are all things literature has been good at, even though it has occasionally been mistaken in its targets and defended the indefensible.

The written word has a special responsibility to do these things because it is better at telling the truth than any audiovisual medium. These media are by their nature condemned to skate over the surface of things and are much more constrained in their freedom of expression. The phenomenal sophistication with which news bulletins can nowadays transport us to the epicentre of events on all five continents has turned us all into voyeurs and the whole world into one vast theatre, or more precisely into a movie. Audiovisual information-so transient, so striking and so superficial-makes us see history as fiction, distancing us by concealing the causes and context behind the sequence of events that are so vividly portrayed. This condemns us to a state of passive acceptance, moral insensibility and psychological inertia similar to that inspired by television fiction and other programmes whose only purpose is to entertain.

I have only read “Death in the Andes” which I thought was excellent. Now, some more books to go get to add to my TBR pile.

What Is Republican Senator Mike Bishop Doing?

The House passed three bills (MI HB 4044, 4045, & 4046) to repeal Michigan’s drug liability laws.

What is Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop’s response?

Republican Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop has said the bills won’t be a priority in his chamber.

I hope that means he’s hard at work on his counter budget proposal. But something tells me that’s not the case.

So he doesn’t want to help Michigan consumers and he still doesn’t have a list of programs he would like to cut from the budget. What is Republican Senator Mike Bishop doing?

He’s been sending out press releases like this one (PDF), with quotes like this:

“Michigan is currently in a state of economic crisis, but closing prisons, reducing our state police force and putting the public’s safety in jeopardy is not the way to solve our budget shortfalls.

“For our part, Senate Republicans have no interest in playing politics with public safety. Despite no warning from the governor’s administration, Senate Republicans will do what we were sent to Lansing to do – to find solutions to serious problems like these without endangering Michigan families and neighborhoods.”

And we’re still waiting for those solutions, Senator Bishop…hello?…hello?…Michigan to Senator Bishop…Budget proposals needed from you…All we see is vapor…

[Update: Your colleague Senate Minority Leader Mark Schauer (D) is sitting across the aisle Senator Bishop, eagerly awaiting your proposals.]

[Update again: Senator Bishop says the 2% sales tax on services is not the solution. But he still doesn't offer any specifics. He sticks to his mantra: government bad, taxes bad. (This reminds me of "Napster Bad!".)

“We honestly believe it can be done,” said Bishop calling for the consolidation of services to make the required budget cuts.
snip
Advocating substantial reform, Bishop was seemingly short on specifics.

His faith in his own party's ability to make budget cuts without raising taxes is not matched by any empirical evidence so far that they have the skills to do so.

“This is not about Republicans or Democrats, it is about common sense,” said Bishop. “I can't get over the fact that this idea of a tax increase is even on the table.”

I can't get over the fact that this man has the unmitigated gall to spout on and on about what he's against, but yet he provides not one solution. And what's an even bigger act of passive idiocy is the way the press in this state is letting him get away with it!]

MI Republicans Say "No" to Cuts, Again

Just how ridiculous are these guys? Today Senator Mike Bishop doesn’t want Governor Granholm to close any prisons as a way to cut money from the budget. He wants to set up a committee to look into it.

Remember, just last week, the Senate Appropriations Committee rejected Granholm’s EO for dealing with this year’s budget shortfall.

“The Republican caucus has said we can get it done with cuts and we’re going to put our money where our mouth is,” Bishop said. He didn’t specify where the cuts would be made but said school aid reductions are on the table.

It was a budget in which they concurred with 90% of the budget cuts.

“Our communication broke down between each other but not in a negative way. We just didn’t have time to sit down with the House,” [Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Shirley] Johnson said, noting that lawmakers agreed with 90 percent of Granholm’s proposed cuts.

The entire state of Michigan is still waiting for Bishop and the Senate Republicans to come up with their list of cuts…We’re still waiting…So far, it doesn’t look like a whole lot is getting done.

Note: If you want a window into just how uninformed the Republican leadership apparently is, take a look here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 288 other followers